Principles of Paediatric Fractures

Overview

*Revisit embryology of bone!

  • As a rule, the younger the patient, the greater the bone remodeling potential
  • Incidence of pediatric fractures rising due to increased sports participation – approximately 50% of children fracture at least one bone during childhood
  • The leading cause of death in children aged 1-14 years is accidental trauma
  • Skeletal trauma accounts for 10-15% of all childhood injuries
  • Open fractures in this population are rare: <5%

Pediatric vs adult bone

PediatricAdult
Higher water contentLower water content
Lower mineral contentHigher mineral content
Less brittle (more elastic)More brittle
Higher strain-to-failureLower strain-to-failure
Stronger in tension than compressionStronger in compression than tension
4 regions:
Diaphysis – shaft/primary ossification center
Metaphysis
Physis – growth plate
Epiphysis – secondary ossification center2 regions:
Diaphysis
Metaphysis

Mechanism of injury

  • Pediatric fractures usually occur at lower energy than adult fractures
  • Most are as a result of:
    • Compression
      • Compression fractures ( “buckle” or “torus” fractures) mostly occur at the metaphyseal diaphyseal junction
      • Rarely cause physical injury, but may result in angular deformity
      • Are impacted and hence stable, rarely requiring manipulative reduction
    • Torsion
      • Torsional injuries result in 2 kinds of fracture patters, depending on the physeal maturity:
        • Long spiral fracture – very young child with thick periosteum, thus the diaphyseal bone fails before the physis
        • Physeal fracture – older child
    • Bending
      • Result in “greenstick fractures”
        • Here the bone is incompletely fractured, resulting in a plastic deformity on the concave side of the fracture
        • The fracture may need to be completed to obtain adequate reduction
      • May also result in microscopic fractures
        • These create plastic deformation of the bone with no visible fracture lines on plain radiographs
        • Permanent deformity can result
      • In older children, may result in transverse or short oblique fractures
        • May present with small butterfly fragment, however, there may only be a buckle of the cortex as pediatric bone fails more easily in compression

Clinical evaluation

  • Full trauma evaluation according to ATLS protocol, if possible with pediatric specialist present
  • History challenges – children may not be the best historians, and parents may not have been present at time of injury, hence patient must be evaluated thoroughly
  • Neurovascular evaluation is mandatory both before and after manipulation
  • Periodically evaluate for compartment syndrome
  • Explain as much to the children as possible listen to their suggestions, STOP when they ask you to
  • When to suspect child abuse
    • Transverse femur fracture in child <1 year old
    • Transverse humerus fracture in child <3 years old
    • Metaphyseal corner fractures (caused by traction/rotation mechanism)
    • History/mechanism of injury inconsistent with fracture pattern
    • Unwitnessed injury that results in a fracture
    • Multiple fractures in various stages of healing
    • Skin stigmata suggestive of abuse: multiple bruises in various stages of resolution, cigarette burns
      • IF ABUSE IS SUSPECTED admit the child + notify social worker

Radiographic evaluation

  • Normal ossification patterns must be thoroughly understood to adequately evaluate plain radiographs
  • Ensure radiographs are ADEQUATE!
    • Views should include an orthogonal projection (obtained 90° from the original view) of involved bone, as well as joints proximal and distal to suspected area of injury
    • Comparison views of opposite extremity may aid in appreciating minimally displaced fractures or subtle deformities (when necessary)
  • ‘Soft signs’ e.g. posterior fat pad sign of the elbow should be closely evaluated
  • Skeletal survey may aid in identifying other fractures in cases of suspected child abuse or multiple traumas
  • CT may help in evaluating complicated intro-articulate fractures in older children
  • MRI can be of value in preop evaluation of a complicated fracture, or evaluation of a fracture not clearly identifiable on plain films due to lack of ossification
  • Bone scans may be used to evaluate tumor or osteomyelitis
  • Ultrasound can be useful for identification of epiphyseal separation in infants
  • Arthrograms are valuable in intraoperative assessment of intraarticular fractures, as radiolucent cartilaginous structures will not be apparent on fluoroscopic or plain radiographs

Classification

Salter-Harris/Ogden Classification

  • Pediatric physeal fractures have traditionally been described by the five-part Salter-Harris classification
  • This has been extended by the Ogden classification to include periphyseal fractures, which do not radiologically appear to involve the physis, but may interfere with physeal blood supply + result in growth disturbance
  • Salter-Harris Types I-V
    • Type I
      • Transphyseal fracture involving hypertrophic and calcified zones
      • Reserve and proliferative zones are preserved hence prognosis is generally excellent
      • Complete or partial growth arrest may occur in displaced fractures
      • Radiographs may be unremarkable – diagnosis is clinical
    • Type II
      • Transphyseal fracture that exits through the metaphysis
      • Metaphyseal fragment = Thurston-Holland fragment
      • The periosteal hinge is intact on the side with the Thurston-Holland fragment
      • Prognosis is excellent, however complete or partial growth arrest may occur in displaced fractures
    • Type III
      • Transphyseal fracture that exits epiphysis
      • Causes intraarticular disruption, as well as disruption of reserve and proliferative zones
      • Anatomic reduction and fixation without violating the physis are essential
      • Common complications include partial growth arrest and resultant angular deformity
    • Type IV
      • Fracture that traverses epiphysis and physis, exiting the metaphysis and disrupting all four zones of the physis
      • Anatomic reduction and fixation without violating the physis are essential
      • Common complications include partial growth arrest and resultant angular deformity
    • Type V
      • Crush injury to they physis
      • Diagnosis usually made retrospectively
      • Poor prognosis as growth arrest and partial physeal closure are common complications
  • Ogden Types VI-IX
    • Type VI
      • Injury to the perichondral ring at the periphery of the physis
      • Usually results from an open injury
      • There may be a peripheral physeal bar to be excised
      • Common complication is formation of peripheral physeal bridges
    • Type VII
      • Involves epiphysis only, including:
        • osteochondral fractures
        • epiphyseal avulsions
      • Prognosis depends on location of fracture and amount of displacement
    • Type VIII
      • Metaphyseal fracture
      • There is disruption of primary circulation to the remodeling center of the cartilage cell columns
      • Angular overgrowth may result from hypervascularity
    • Type IX
      • Diaphyseal fracture
      • There is disruption of the mechanism for appositional growth (the periosteum)
      • Prognosis is generally good if reduction is maintained
      • Can complicate with cross-union between the tibia and fibula and between the radius and ulna if there is intermingling of the respective periosteums

Treatment

  • Children have a thick periosteum in case of diaphyseal fractures and an open physis in case of metaphyseal fractures, thus:
    • The tough periosteum may help in reduction by serving as a hinge (the periosteum on the concave side for the deformity is usually intact) and preventing overreduction
    • To disengage fragments and retain traction, controlled recreation and exaggeration of the fracture deformity may be necessary, as longitudinal traction is inadequate
    • Adequate reduction may be prevented by:
      • a periosteal flap entrapped in the fracture site
      • buttonholing of a sharp fracture end through the periosteum
    • Physeal injuries should not be re-manipulated after 5-7 days
  • Children (especially when younger) have great remodeling potential, hence considerable fracture deformity may be permitted
    • In general, fractures closer the the joint (physis) tolerate deformity better – e.g. in a proximal humeral fracture, 45-60 degrees of angulation is permissible, however, a midshaft radial or tibial fracture must be brought to within 10 degrees of normal alignment
    • Rotational deformity should be avoided even in young children, as it does not spontaneously correct or remodel to an acceptable extent
  • Severely shortened or comminuted fractures may require skin or skeletal traction
    • Traction pins should be placed proximal to the nearest distal physis
    • Care should be taken not to place the traction pin through the physis
  • Fracture reduction should be performed under conscious sedation, followed by immobilization in a splint or bivalved cast
    • Univalving, especially with a fiberglass cast, does not provide adequate cast flexibility necessary to accommodate extremity swelling
  • In children, casts or splints should encompass the joint proximal and distal to the site of injury
    • Post-immobilisation stiffness is not a common problem for children
    • Short arm or short leg casts are only used as opposed to longer immobilization techniques in rare cases such as stable torus fracture of distal radius
  • All fractures should be elevated at above heart level, iced and frequently monitored with attention to extremity warmth, capillary refill and sensation. Admit for observation if necessary
  • Fractures in which reduction cannot be achieved or maintained should be splinted and the child put under general anesthesia with which complete relaxation may be achieved
  • Intraarticular fractures and Salter-Harris types III and IV require anatomic reduction
    • This involves <1-2mm of displacement both vertically and horizontally
    • Serves to restore articular congruity and minimize physeal bar formation
  • Indications for open reduction:
    • Most open fractures
    • Displaced intra-articular fractures (Salter-Harris types III and IV)
    • Fractures with vascular compromise
    • Fractures with associated compartment syndrome
    • Unstable fractures requiring abnormal positioning to maintain closed reduction

Complications

  • Complete growth arrest
    • May occur with physeal injuries in Salter-Harris fractures
    • May result in limb length discrepancies necessitating
      • use of orthotics
      • use of prosthetics
      • operative interventions for correction e.g. osteotomy
  • Overgrowth
    • May be seen in certain pediatric fractures, e.g. of the femoral diaphysis
  • Progressive angular or rotational deformities
    • May result from physeal injuries with partial growth arrest, or malunion
    • May also occur in some metaphyseal fractures, e.g. of proximal tibia
    • May require operative interventions for correction e.g. osteotomy, in case of significant functional disability or cosmetic deformity
  • Osteonecrosis
    • May result from disruption of tenuous blood supply in skeletally immature patients in whom vascular development is incomplete, e.g. osteonecrosis of femoral head in slipped capital femoral epiphysis
Dr. Maryanne Fernandes
Dr. Maryanne Fernandes

Hyperexcision storyteller and contributor. I explore the intersection of the heart and mind in the practice of medicine. Dedicated to meaningful communication and helping learners build confidence.

Articles: 13

Post Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *